Skip to main content

Dogwood Blossoms And Direct Funding

Jejak PandaSelamat Datang Di Website Kesayangam Anda
bandarq online
In “The Waste Land,” T. S. Eliot wrote that April is the cruelest month; having been an expatriate and born in Missouri, Eliot could not have known that he was off by a month. At least by New England standards. Those of you who spent yesterday evening bailing out your basements know what I mean. I feel as if I have been wet for days. Thank goodness the weather is supposed to clear up. The only nice days I have experienced recently were the first two days of my trip to Washington, DC for the National Writing Project’s Spring Meeting. When I first arrived it was warm and sunny when I got off the train, and it was a delight to walk the three blocks to the hotel.

The cherry trees were not in bloom yet but the dogwoods were. I think the dogwoods and other flowering trees in DC get overshadowed by the cherry trees. All their white blossoms were just spectacular. They literally weighed down the branches of the trees and made them droop toward the sidewalks. I frequently had to duck beneath them as I passed below. The walk from the hotel on Capitol Hill to the legislative office buildings passes through a beautiful park filled with flowering trees and historical plaques marking the locations of various buildings and homes where famous men and women once lived and worked. The sunny spring days we enjoyed on Wednesday and Thursday made it hard to keep walking to the other side of Capitol Hill where we had work to do lobbying for the reauthorization of funding for the National Writing Project.

This year had threatened to be especially difficult, as President Obama’s and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan’s budget proposals for education involved, among other things, consolidating many directly funded programs such as the National Writing Project, Reading is Fundamental, and Teach for America, just to name a few. The idea is to provide block grants to states that various discrete educational institutions could then apply for. This concept is not new and has been proposed before, more typically under Republican administrations, and the idea is to treat education more like business; to make educators compete and thus design innovative proposals to earn funding for their projects. Of course in the case of the National Writing Project and other directly funded federal programs, this would mean even in the best case scenario that the national infrastructure which supports all 210 Writing Project sites would be eliminated, as would many small, poorly funded sites.

Anyway, without going into too much boring detail, it does not look like the National Writing Project is going to lose its direct federal funding. In general, the legislators we talked with said that in principle they like the idea of providing block grants to states to promote innovative education proposals, but not at the expense of programs with documented track records of success. And no legislators want to see universities in their districts or states lose federal funds. And Representative George Miller of California is a big supporter of the National Writing Project and he’s the chairman of the Committee on Education and Labor. So, in short, it looks like we’ll be all right. Though I am crossing my fingers and toes.

Lobbying legislators sounds like it might be a dull process, but I actually find the experience interesting and kind of fun, at least sometimes. Perhaps the most surprising thing to teachers when they first experience lobbying at the Spring Meeting is that so much of the actual work of running the government is done by underpaid aides and college interns. I’m perfectly serious. It’s rare that anyone gets to meet with an actual congressperson or senator. I had appointments with Senators Dodd and Lieberman, as well as Representatives DeLauro and Courtney. Other TCs from Storrs as well as Central and Fairfield had appointments with the other three representatives from Connecticut. Only Himes and Courtney actually met face to face with any of us. And both of them are ingusan legislators. In every other case we were met by aides. Senator Lieberman’s education aide was the most interesting one we met. He’s a twenty-year teaching veteran from Kansas who is on sabbatical from his high school to do an internship in Washington as a legislative aide. He was great to talk to because, of course, he knew what we were talking about.

But the long and short of what typically occurs is that there are far too many pieces of legislation for the senators and congresspeople to keep track of, and so the aides basically tell them what to support. We asked Lieberman’s aide to have the Senator sign the Dear Colleague letter, and so if he thinks support for direct funding for the National Writing Project is something consistent with the Senator’s positions on education, he makes sure to stick a copy of the Dear Colleague letter under Senator Lieberman’s nose and get him to sign it. When we ask Representatives DeLauro’s and Courtney’s aides to submit letters of support, those aides (or more likely someone working beneath them) type up a letter and give it to the aide who then gets it under the Representative’s nose for a signature. On the one hand, this might seem discouraging, as the elected officials themselves appear to be doing so little of the work of government. But on the other hand, it is rather encouraging to know that regular people are doing the work of running the government. And I do mean regular people. The aides are rather modestly paid with small, crowded office spaces. They are often young, and many have second jobs. Two of the four I met with moonlight as adjunct professors at local schools, one at a DC area community college.

On the last day in DC the bad weather returned. It was cold and threatening rain the whole morning, but the dogwood blossoms still looked beautiful against the grey sky.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Travel And Transformation

Jejak Panda Menambah Ilmu Dengan Membaca Di Situs Kesayangan Anda judi ceme online Lately, one of the toughest things about writing this column has been deciding what to write about. There is plenty of education news to discuss, but it’s mostly depressing—budget cuts and job shortages. I feel awful for the students going onto the market now. There are so many talented students in both English and Education that are entering a bleak job market and are essentially competing amongst themselves for a handful of positions. So anyway, I didn’t want to write about that because it’s nothing everyone doesn’t already know and isn’t already upset about. So then I thought I should write about the New England Writing Projects Annual Retreat we’re hosting at UConn this weekend, but I really should write about that next week after it has happened and I have something to report on. Right now the only thing I could really write about is how frustrated I am by people who cancel at the

Making Writing And Literature Contemporary

Jejak Panda Selamat Datang Kembali Di Blog Kesayangan Anda bandar ceme Every fall I teach a section of an American Literature survey course. I always tweak the writing assignments, but for several years I have been giving a version of the same assignment. Students have to use one or more of the texts from the course as lenses through which to view and interpret a contemporary ‘text,’ which I define broadly to include any current book, film, television series, political or cultural event or figure. Students have the option of writing two, seven-page essays, one due at midterm and the other at the final, or of working throughout the semester on one fifteen page essay. About a third of my current twenty students have chosen the fifteen page option. Students must do research on their contemporary text, which can involve reading news articles or watching sitcoms, depending on the nature of the text they choose, and they must draft. There are four response group sessions and two te

Veterans Day And War Literature

Jejak Panda Senantiasa Menyambut Kedatang Anda Untuk Membaca bandarqq As Veterans Day approached, I found myself thinking about the many books we read in my American Literature course that deal with war and its consequences. Though Huck Finn does not deal directly with war, it’s difficult to study the work of Mark Twain and not discuss the Civil War or Twain’s anti-war and anti-imperialist writings. William Faulkner notoriously lied about his World War I service record but later became a goodwill ambassador for the State Department and won the first of his two Pulitzer Prizes in 1955 for A Fable , which chronicles a soldier’s unsuccessful attempt to end fighting in World War I. Hemingway is perhaps the only American author to win the Pulitzer and the Nobel Prizes as well as a Silver Medal and a Bronze Star. His early works, especially The Sun Also Rises and A Farewell to Arms , chronicle the horrors of war and its aftermath. Even works like A Streetcar Named Desire or On